Regulation of Amateur MMA - Fight Rules

I've posted a lot about the Iowa Athletic Commission's endeavors to regulate amateur mixed martial arts matches and subject them to the same scrutiny as professional matches.  Despite the loss of some small promotions that exclusively showcased amateur fighters, I stand by my statement that the regulation of amateur MMA is "good for the development of mixed martial arts in the state of Iowa."  The real question, in my view, is whether amateur MMA should be subject to the same regulations as professional MMA and, in particular, whether the matches themselves should be governed under the same rules.

The Association of Boxing Commissions has a set of unified rules for mixed martial arts, that are followed in most states, including Iowa.  ABC does not have a similar set for amateur MMA, but it does offer a list of "suggested" amateur fouls that, in addition to professional fouls, also prohibits:

  1. Elbow and forearm strikes
  2. Neck cranks
  3. Heel hooks
  4. Knees to the head
  5. Hand chokes
  6. Spine attacks
  7. Strikes to or around the knee joint.
  8. Dropping an opponent on his or her head or neck.

Effective January 1, 2010, the New Jersey State Athletic Control Board passed a separate set of rules governing amateur MMA. The passage of amateur rules by New Jersey is significant because, in 2000, New Jersey was the first state to regulate professional MMA and its rules served as a template for the ABC unified rules. 

The New Jersey amateur MMA rules closely parallel the ABC's list of suggested fouls, which is not surprising since Nick Lembo, counsel for the NJSACB, is also chair of ABC's MMA Rules Committee.   Some differences are that New Jersey also prohibits kicks to the head and any strikes the head of a downed opponent.  

Many states do not have separate rules for amateur MMA, but most allow promoters to impose their own rules, as long as they are more restrictive than the state's rules. 

It makes perfect sense to have more rules in place to protect the safety of amateur fighters. That said, every additional foul that is added to the rules creates a bigger divide between the amateur and professional ranks.  When amateur matches are designed, in part, to give fighters experience before turning pro and facing harder competition, the benefits of amateur experience are lessened if the two types of fights have substantially different sets of rules.

Comments are on, readers.  What additional rules do you think should be in place for amateurs?

Iowa Athletic Commission Shuts Down MMA Event

Earlier this month I blogged that a promoter should "never EVER ignore the Athletic Commission." The folks at the Midwest Fighting Championship apparently do not read this blog.

The Midwest Fighting Championship (not to be confused with the Midwest Cage Championship, also based in Iowa) was scheduled to host an event in Bloomfield, Iowa, on August 20.  Unfortunately, as of August 19, they had not yet submitted the necessary paperwork to the Iowa Athletic Commission.  The required paperwork includes blood test results for the fighters and proof of medical insurance purchased by the promotion.  As a result, the head of the Iowa Athletic Commission enlisted the local sheriff to serve a cease and desist letter and call off the event. 

After getting the news, Midwest Fighting Championship's Facebook page said (in all caps and without any punctuation):

Yes, fights are off.  If anyone thinks they can run a better show go ahead.  Can't do anything when the state shuts you down.

The latter sentence is certainly true.  You CAN'T do anything when the state shuts you down.  You can, however, follow the rules and PREVENT the state from shutting you down.  The regulations at issue here are quite clear.  Indeed, in a June 27 post on that same Facebook page, MFC announced the release of the proposed regulations governing amateur mixed martial arts saying: "Basically the main changes for amateur fighters are they will need blood work for hiv, hep b, and hep c and will have to provide proof that they are 18 or older." 

Iowa Administrative Code Section 875-177.5(11) requires that the blood work for each fighter be submitted to the state at least one week in advance of the event.  Here, it appears that the Athletic Commission gave the promoters extra time to comply, but eventually had to pull the plug.

While the comments on the MFC Facebook page predictably call Iowa's officials nasty names for canceling the show, I find it awfully hard to fault them for doing their jobs and protecting the fighters. But, at the end of the day, whether a promoter ignores my view is not the point.  The point is: never EVER ignore the Athletic Commission.

Iowa Athletic Commission Releases Proposed MMA Regulations

The new Iowa law governing mixed martial arts goes into effect July 1, 2010.  Among other things, the law gives the Iowa Athletic Commission the authority to regulate amateur MMA.   The law did not, however, specify the regulations to be enforced.

The Commission has now released a draft of the proposed regulations it wishes to implement.  The bulletin containing these (and other proposed regulations not related to MMA) is available here.  It downloads as a PDF, which you can then search for 8752B (the MMA regs). Interested parties can comment on the proposed regulations until May 26.